Importers in the retail and consumer products sectors should be carefully reviewing their trade compliance policies and procedures as Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is scrutinizing customs compliance in a number of areas — including declarations of origin, tariff classification and customs valuation. Failure to meet these requirements under the Customs Act (Act) can result in [...]
Importers in the retail and consumer products sectors should be carefully reviewing their trade compliance policies and procedures as Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is scrutinizing customs compliance in a number of areas — including declarations of origin, tariff classification and customs valuation.
Failure to meet these requirements under the Customs Act (Act) can result in the imposition of administrative monetary penalties, seizures and ascertained forfeitures, the assessment of duties, taxes and penalizing interest, and the denial of duty-free access to the Canadian market. Of particular concern for retailers with just-in-time business models, non-compliance significantly disrupts cross-border product flow and can cause lengthy and costly delays in getting your product into the hands of Canadian consumers.
Getting the Price Right: Customs Valuation Vulnerabilities
In particular, we are observing increased CBSA audit and enforcement activity regarding customs valuation i.e., the value of goods declared for purposes of calculating customs duties and taxes owing on importation. In this context, common areas of compliance vulnerability include:
- related party transactions — in order to use the price paid to a related vendor importers must be able to demonstrate that the price was not influence by the relationship; in certain circumstances, and provided they have properly documented and supported their methodology, importers may be able to use as a “base” the price established in accordance with income tax transfer pricing principles, subject to a number of adjustments;
- transfer pricing adjustments — adjustments or “true-ups” to related party transaction pricing may also trigger specific customs obligations to correct past entries and remit additional customs duties, taxes and interest;
- post-importation payments (subsequent proceeds) — CBSA is aggressively reviewing payments made by importers that at first instance may appear unrelated to the price of the goods; as highlighted in further detail in Importer Alert: New CBSA Guidelines on Post-Importation Payments and Management and Administration Fees, unless certain conditions are satisfied, CBSA will determine that management and administrative fees paid by the importer should be included in the customs valuation of imported goods;
- other adjustments to the price paid — in addition to subsequent proceeds, the Act requires the addition of a number of other amounts to the price paid or payable by the importer to the extent that they are not already included in the price when determining value for duty; these include commissions and brokerage paid by the purchaser of the goods (excluding buying commissions), packing costs, assists such as tools and dies and engineering and art and design work, certain royalties and license fees and transportation and insurance costs relating to the transportation of the goods to place from which they are shipped directly to Canada; and
- proper use of other customs valuation methods — in some circumstances, the price paid or payable by the importer cannot be used and other methods under the Act must be considered in sequence; these include the transaction value of identical or similar goods, the computed value (cost-plus), the deductive value (resale value-minus), and, if those cannot be applied, the residual method; using these other valuation methods can be complex and time-consuming and, in cases of uncertainty, importers may wish to seek CBSA rulings to confirm their approach.
CBSA detects compliance failures in these areas through a number of monitoring mechanisms, including desk audits and the more comprehensive compliance verifications. These are carried out by CBSA on a random basis as well as by targeting priority areas — further detail can be found in CBSA’s Trade Compliance Post-Release Verifications — January 2012. A number of retail and consumer products are currently on CBSA’s priority target list.
Mitigating Risk Exposure
There are a number of actions that retail and consumer product importers can take to address the significant risks in this area, including:
- conducting an assessment of your current trade compliance status, include past contraventions, current procedures, testing and sampling of transactions;
- developing and implementing clearly articulated and readily accessible trade compliance manual and procedures that are regularly reviewed and updated;
- appointing senior officer(s) responsible for the implementation and enforcement of trade compliance policies and procedures;
- educating and training appropriate officials on trade and customs requirements;
- internal procedures for reporting potential trade compliance violations;
- using, as appropriate, CBSA’s voluntary disclosure process for relief from monetary penalties, penalizing interest and other enforcement action;
- using, as appropriate, CBSA’s ruling process to obtain additional comfort; and
- regular reviewing, testing and enhancement of processes and procedures to ensure continued full compliance.
In light of CBSA’s increased enforcement in this area and the highly competitive and just-in-time nature of the Canadian retail and consumer products sector, a robust trade and customs compliance program is now viewed as a competitive advantage in the Canadian marketplace — it ensures the smooth and timely flow of product across the border and protects against costly penalties and other CBSA enforcement action.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.
Canada Border Services Agency, commonly referred to as CBSA, has released their 2011 International Trade Compliance targets. They regularly do this to ensure the trade community knows where there focus is. As an importer or exporter it tells you that if you deal with these products you are at higher risk of being included in one of the various international trade compliance audit programs that CBSA has. If you are included in these groups, then your need to ensure your trade compliance strategy is solid and encompassing all aspects we presented so far is critical.
There are 2 specific trade compliance programs that CBSA conduct, Random and those deemed a National Priority.
Random Compliance Verifications
The key to note is that Random is usually related to hot spots that pop up during the year, either you or your trade service provider should be plugged into information sources that broadcast that kind of information. There are many ways to get that sort of information, a few of them are;
The government states that random trade compliance verifications;
“Random verifications are designed to measure compliance rates and revenue seepage and the results may be used for many purposes”
Some of those purposes include,
• Risk assessment,
• Establishing client service activities,
• Revenue assessment, and
• Promoting voluntary compliance.
The biggest shift in the past 12 months is that the Canadian government has gone from almost a sole focus on security to one that is now focused on the Health, Safety, and Security of Canadians. This change in focus is of course driven by events in the news that suggest the Government isn’t protecting it’s citizens. A few examples include the news surrounding children’s toys from China made with paints that contained products deemed toxic in Canada, or the baby bottles made using plastic containing Bisphenol A (BPA).
While the Canadian government shares this list of National Priorities that focus on areas’ of Tariff Classification, Valuation, or Origin the fact remains that while examining one aspect related to products in their target zone, it is very easy to expand that to the others and in doing so catch multiple issues relating to trade compliance. That of course is a worst case scenario, but one we have seen before. The aspect to keep in mind is that the government does not constrain itself to this list as it states;
“National priorities (NPs) are determined through a risk-based, evergreen process; i.e., new NPs may be added throughout the fiscal year. NP verifications may also be carried over from previous years.”
According to Alan Dewar, Vice President, Canadian Operations of GHY International, “The most difficult part of this process for traders is that a single line item on the government’s list, may relate to ten’s of thousands of products, when in fact the government may be focused on a very specific item in those thousands of items”, he goes on to share, “as an example look at chapter 39, miscellaneous articles of plastic, what articles are they interested in, they government will never tell you.” This becomes a challenge when considering your trade compliance strategy as the specific focus in unknown, so the question must be asked how forensically do you need to go with your trade compliance efforts in order to ensure that you don’t leave a large compliance gap open. According to Alan, he suggests you consider looking at your products from a top down approach based upon import dollars spent. The largest risk financial is usually in correlation to the volume of dollars spent on that product.
Click below for the full report: